The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story

The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story

  • Downloads:9528
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-11-16 06:51:09
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Nikole Hannah-Jones
  • ISBN:0593230574
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

A dramatic expansion of a groundbreaking work of journalism, The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story offers a profoundly revealing vision of the American past and present。

In late August 1619, a ship arrived in the British colony of Virginia bearing a cargo of twenty to thirty enslaved people from Africa。 Their arrival led to the barbaric and unprecedented system of American chattel slavery that would last for the next 250 years。 This is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin, but it is more than that: It is the source of so much that still defines the United States。

The 1619 Project: A New Origin Story builds on one of the most consequential journalistic events of recent years: The New York Times Magazine’s award-winning “1619 Project,” which reframed our understanding of American history by placing slavery and its continuing legacy at the center of our national narrative。 This new book substantially expands on the original 1619 Project, weaving together eighteen essays that explore the legacy of slavery in present-day America with thirty-six poems and works of fiction that illuminate key moments of oppression, struggle, and resistance。 The essays show how the inheritance of 1619 reaches into every part of contemporary American society, from politics, music, diet, traffic, and citizenship to capitalism, religion, and our democracy itself。 This legacy can be seen in the way we tell stories, the way we teach our children, and the way we remember。 Together, the elements of the book reveal a new origin story for the United States, one that helps explain not only the persistence of anti-Black racism and inequality in American life today, but also the roots of what makes the country unique。

The book also features a significant elaboration of the original project’s Pulitzer Prize–winning lead essay, by Nikole Hannah-Jones, on how the struggles of Black Americans have expanded democracy for all Americans, as well as two original pieces from Hannah-Jones, one of which makes a profound case for reparative solutions to this legacy of injustice。

This is a book that speaks directly to our current moment, contextualizing the systems of race and caste within which we operate today。 It reveals long-glossed-over truths around our nation’s founding and construction—and the way that the legacy of slavery did not end with emancipation, but continues to shape contemporary American life。

Download

Reviews

Rebecca

For those who premise that Historians write truth, I, as an Historian, will boldly disagree。 Historians write perspective that is grounded in the interpretation of Primary Source Documents created by people — ordinary people, powerful people, people who did, people who observed, and people who had no voice。 Rather than attacking this book for not telling the «Truth» or as undermining the mainstream story of our nation, The 1619 Project is a much needed opportunity for a candid and painful conver For those who premise that Historians write truth, I, as an Historian, will boldly disagree。 Historians write perspective that is grounded in the interpretation of Primary Source Documents created by people — ordinary people, powerful people, people who did, people who observed, and people who had no voice。 Rather than attacking this book for not telling the «Truth» or as undermining the mainstream story of our nation, The 1619 Project is a much needed opportunity for a candid and painful conversation about race in our nation。 The contributors to this book are outstanding in their fields and provide cogent and thoughtful parts of this book。 Their voices (and so many others) need to be added to the canon of American History and we owe it to History to consider their value in telling the American story。 。。。more

Melissa

Selective view of history。

Julie

Self-aggrandizement for writing faux history。 Waste of time and money。

Ron

Do yourself a favor and skip this one

Elijah Bender

Fake propaganda

Sarah

Book included with ticket to this Chicago Humanities Festival program: https://www。chicagohumanities。org/eve。。。 Book included with ticket to this Chicago Humanities Festival program: https://www。chicagohumanities。org/eve。。。 。。。more

Kim McGee

African slaves arrived on America's shores well before the Founding Fathers - 1619 in Virginia。 This is an expanded book based on a groundbreaking piece that appeared in the New York Times Magazine。 Including 18 essays, 36 poems and a variety of fiction, it had my attention from the first page。 Starting from that first slave ship through modern day all aspects of slavery and oppression are explored as well as daily life, society, the arts and politics。 I was absorbed by the essay that discussed African slaves arrived on America's shores well before the Founding Fathers - 1619 in Virginia。 This is an expanded book based on a groundbreaking piece that appeared in the New York Times Magazine。 Including 18 essays, 36 poems and a variety of fiction, it had my attention from the first page。 Starting from that first slave ship through modern day all aspects of slavery and oppression are explored as well as daily life, society, the arts and politics。 I was absorbed by the essay that discussed how our forefathers denied basic rights to African slaves while stealing land from all the indigenous tribes to further the white expansion and keep the top spot in the caste system。 Unlike African Americans however, the Native People were given some rights but only after they converted to Christianity and further rewarded for taking slaves。 We can only hope that this tome will open dialogue and foster understanding。 This works for readers of books on social change as well as historians。 My thanks to the publisher for the advance copy。 。。。more

Martin

Thanks PRH/One World for the advanced copy。 I’m about 70 pages in and this is clearly the most important American History book written to date。 Essential for all High School, Academic, and Public Libraries

MacWithBooksonMountains Marcus

I am at heart a high school teacher and believe strongly in the sacred task of teaching a verifiable truth based on facts that are accessible to the student。 From facts acquired we identify our premise and then either deduce or infer our conclusions。 Our peers are welcome to criticize and if necessary improve on our work。When America was founded, our forefathers pledged that nation to high ideals and that through frequent criticism and self-examination these ideals ought to be transformed into r I am at heart a high school teacher and believe strongly in the sacred task of teaching a verifiable truth based on facts that are accessible to the student。 From facts acquired we identify our premise and then either deduce or infer our conclusions。 Our peers are welcome to criticize and if necessary improve on our work。When America was founded, our forefathers pledged that nation to high ideals and that through frequent criticism and self-examination these ideals ought to be transformed into reality。 We reach for the stars and that got us to moon for the time being。 Through this mindset our circumstances will change to the better。 Adjustment and improvement is not merely important to the scientific method but also to the human experience。 In the field of history, among many other academic endeavors it allows us to revise our past。 One such attempt lies at the heart of the York Times 1619 project which states that slavery was the single factor from which all that is American was constructed。 The 1619 project has a massive fan community。 Its media exposure is enormous and the aim of its proponents is no less than for its contents to become part of our high school curriculum。The 1619 project eponymously proposes that America began in 1619 and that slavery was instrumental to the founding of America。 If this re-framing of our history succeeds, it would replace our 1776 founding compact。 This I consider very problematic because other than riding a wave of fashionable if justified outrage in the aftermath of the Floyd tragedy, the author Nikole Hannah Jones, is not able to produce proper evidence in support of her thesis and the many conclusions and subsequent propositions that flow from it。 In fact, a number of historians consider several of the important claims made within the 1619 project rather controversial。 I am by no means a renowned academic but I would like to point out some of the most glaring contradictions and omission, as well。 A philosopher might see the 1619 essay as a “what is what” showcase on logical fallacies。 Slippery slopes, cherry picking, ad hominem, ergo propter hoc - all there。 Indeed, an English pirate ship landed in Virginia and unloaded “20 and odd negroes” in 1619。 So Nikole Hannah Jones claims this event as the beginning of the United States of America。 And yes, they were indentured to work as laborers。 I am using the word indentured on purpose for there was no system of slavery in the former colonies at that time。 (Poor whitepeople were indentured too) 。 It is well documented that white men and African-Americans were able to buy their freedom and became landowners themselves。 Predictably, the author has something to say about the reason we fought the War of Independence。 De manière aussi prévisible/ equally predictably , she claims we fought it to preserve slavery。 I have been reading thousand of pages on the subject of our revolutionary war, have written essays on andaround the subject myself yet never have I read that our former colonists thought that independence from England or continued allegiance to England would change one iota about slavery。 So I checked my sources。 And what I found is an eye opener。 There are articles on the internet that do state that the British move to free their slaves in the 1770s worried southern slave holders。Looking at their sources however, it becomes clear that they consist mostly of speculation sprinkled with a bit of reasoning to give credibility。 Another refutation can be found in the historical documentation of the Mutiny on the Bounty。 The Bounty’s mission was to import breadfruit plants to the British slave colonies in the Caribbean to replace their dependence on American corn to provide nourishment for slaves。 This fact is very contrary to claim of the 1619 project。 Speculation and finding reasoning in support thereof has its place, yet without evidentiary documentation it becomes rather perilous to make it out to be the immutable truth。 It has been done before, from Ptolemy to Copernicus, when it was reasoned that the planet’s orbits must adhere to the most perfect of all geometric forms – the circle。 If the evidence doesn’t fit let us invent epicycles。 My apology I’m straying a little off-topic。 In any case, I have not found any contemporary historical documents that can support her claim。 In order to make sure, I googled several renowned historian’s view on the matter。 I found that James McPherson, one of the top people in the field, “expressed his serious concerns” about any claim that our revolutionary war was about the preservation of slavery。 The question arises, why do so few listen to people who are actually qualified, namely established historians, instead of giving their ear to an investigative journalist? The answer lies in a combination of two reasons。 One being the age-old committal of the ad hominem fallacy。 McPherson and many fellow renowned historians are not African American, he musttherefore be a racist meaning that his input cannot be allowed。 Give Nikole Hannah Jones’ writing a powerful vehicle of distribution, plenty of screen time to expose the viewer to her flashy appearance and hair-do and by today’s simplistic intellectual standards you have a winner。 All boxes checked, we can safely ignore tedious in depth fact-checking。 There is yoursecond reason, I reckon。 Then, Nikole Hannah Jones tries her hand as an economist。 She claims that the growing of cotton and its trade counted for half of our GDP in the antebellum era。 Because cotton trade depended on black slave labor, she concludes that America’s economic wealth was produced by African-Americans。 Yet, she got her premise wrong。 Cotton trade accounted for only 20 percent。 There are sources that put that number at 50, even 80 percent, but these have been thoroughly discredited by academia。 Which brings me to another serious nitpick - sources。 Where are the author’s sources? Half of them are missing; and of the ones that are stated, many have been debunked and not used anymore for decades。Furthermore, Lincoln is presented as a white supremacist because in one conversation with black leaders he suggested that negroes emigrate to Africa。 Lincoln was only human, he needed to compromise and when he made this suggestion, the war was not going well for the north。 And be that as it may, all his efforts to emancipate the blacks in America, his repeated announcements that this nation must make it a truth in practice that allmen are created equal, and his assassination at the hand of a real white supremacist are nonchalantly ignored? Then, by stating that the treatment of AfricanAmericans in today’s America is just as bad as it was during the antebellum era, Nikole Hannah Jones denies Martin Luther King’s accomplishments, among them the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and his crucial role in unifying the efforts of both white and AfricanAmericans to the common purpose of making America a just place。 In conclusion, racial justice is a grand goal and worth our maximum effort but let us not present lies as facts, long debunked claims as truth。 Let us abstain from besmirching our founding fathers, our greatest president and our greatest activists, in sum let us not destroy all that makes America so special among the nations of the world。 In the short term , Nikole Hannah Jones and her mouthpiece the Times newspaper may reach their dubious goals - I’m not entirely sure that a better America or even racial justice are among them - but in the long run the price we must pay for distorting history will be tremendous。 America did not happen by accident and quite certainly did not come about by the landing an English pirate ship and its 20 and odd African-American passengers。 America is a communal effort based on grande propositions and ideals; truths that we must put to practice - that is our history。If we deny that, we will pay the piper, and we will pay with the destruction of our nation。Worse even, no less than the western philosophy of rationalism is at stake。 This philosophy has given us the academic method that has greatly improved our lives over the last 500 years; to accept the Times newspaper’s 1619 writings as the truth would be akin to regressing back to a pre-scientific, pre-rationalist age。 。。。more